/execute, only way to kill /tie'd fucks.

[Serious_Michael]

I think mercs should have an /execute <id> command. It can only be done in the car, the person has to be tied, it has a reload time, level 1 is 20 min, level 2 is 18, and so on, just like dropcar, you have to have an SD pistol (a Spas or an MP5 would get your car too messy), and the person can't have armor on, and obviously you can't do this while you're cuffed or tied.

The bridge drop and DeAndre can be too much of a hassle, and it's a lot easier to RP shooting someone in the head than it is to RP feeding someone to a shark sticking out of a building. It'll say "You have been executed by [name]" so you can report abuse and stuff.

I mean, I don't think this can be abused any more than tying can.

[William_Averitti]

I like it... its a better RP way to kill, and a newer way.. instead of shark feed or bridge fall...
/tie ID
/me Loads his shotgun
/s Say your prayers mutha fucka!
/execute ID
(Wait in 20 mins for next execute)

If thats what you mean... I cant think of anything bad that would happend with it. most people tie someone to murder them, in either bridge or shark.. so they can use this instead.

[Leo_Cash]

I dont know what to think about that idea. I like it but i think it would be abused by everyone. Kinda too easy way. Just bridgedrops. Its fun.

[Serious_Michael]

I like it... its a better RP way to kill, and a newer way.. instead of shark feed or bridge fall...
/tie ID
/me Loads his shotgun
/s Say your prayers mutha fucka!
/execute ID
(Wait in 20 mins for next execute)

If thats what you mean... I cant think of anything bad that would happend with it. most people tie someone to murder them, in either bridge or shark.. so they can use this instead.

Well sortof, but executing someone in a car with a shotgun is dumb, that's why you need to have an SD pistol to execute.

And Cash, how could this be abused more than bridgedrop or sharkdump?

[Keegan_Russo]

only if we also get a /sexecute command


ME SEXECUTES YOU BY THRUSTING HIS PENIS THROUGH YOUR EYESOCKET

[David_Lewis]

This is actually a pretty good idea, but it would have to be person specific...

As in the only person who can /execute is the person who /tied them, which might prove to be difficult considering the current system allows Anyone to /tie /untie people, which also leads me to believe there is no tracking system on who does the /tie.

Although, adding a "You misses the victim and he/she escapes!!!" clause, causing the victim to escape the /tie, might make it a little more "Fair"

[Serious_Michael]

I like the clause idea, and depending on your level it lowers the chances of their escape.

[Montel_Chilliams]

This would make it impossible for you to save a buddy who might have gotten tied up. Let's say you're driving in a full car, you get car jacked by a merc, then he ties someone up and kills them instantly right in front of you. At least with sharks/bridge you have a chance at blowing the merc's car up, and saving your friend.

Maybe it can take 60 seconds before the command is executed giving you some time to save your friend from instantly dying before your eyes.

[Leo_Cash]

what about /rape command? Just kidding, i like the post above mine. Some corrections and it would be a good idea.

[Young_Gotti]

Agreed is should be like when you claim a point there's a countdown before you drop his ass,so he can be saved and the lvl of merc is supposed to affect the chance's or his or you're succes to kill or his succes to escape.As post above said:Few corrections and this would be a great idea.

[Serious_Michael]

This would make it impossible for you to save a buddy who might have gotten tied up. Let's say you're driving in a full car, you get car jacked by a merc, then he ties someone up and kills them instantly right in front of you. At least with sharks/bridge you have a chance at blowing the merc's car up, and saving your friend.

Maybe it can take 60 seconds before the command is executed giving you some time to save your friend from instantly dying before your eyes.

I mean, shark & bridge are useful for threats, hostages, scaring, and so on. But if I tie someone and my boss says "I want him dead now." it'll be more efficient to not give the guy time to escape.

[Montel_Chilliams]

Another situation this could be abused:
You get arrested by 2 cops, they are taking you to jail. On your way there you tie the passanger cop and /execute him.

To prevent this, only the driver of the car should be able to /execute.

[TRA]

Yea but we got motha fuckas that still likes to tie people when they are not the driver.I mean saying this and that will be abused isnt going to prove if its a good or bad idea.I mean 90% of the time anything can and will be abused.But yea if this does get put it make it some time before you can /execute.........what Montel said

[David_York]

only if we also get a /sexecute command


ME SEXECUTES YOU BY THRUSTING HIS PENIS THROUGH YOUR EYESOCKET

Don't cha mean /rape?

Edit: Just gave me an idea. A level 5 prostitute can rape people for health.

[Serious_Michael]

Another situation this could be abused:
You get arrested by 2 cops, they are taking you to jail. On your way there you tie the passanger cop and /execute him.

To prevent this, only the driver of the car should be able to /execute.

Or you just can't kill while you're cuffed or tied or detained.

[Jose_Ramirez]

I like this idea seems like you have thought alot on it so i wouldn't see a problem if this was added.

[Jack]

It's good. but only when it's not getting abused.

[Joe_Crane]

I dunno...You are too lazy to drop fucks from the bridge? That /execute shit will abuse, thats for sure.

[Andriy_Kovalenko]

Honestly, this idea sucks.

[Banjo]

Honestly, this idea sucks.

It seriously does.

Solution: DE ANDRE THE SHARK, LADIES & GENTLEMEN.

[Rosco_Flatts]

If this ever happens, I might consider executing you, Bill.

[Juke]

wouldn't be necessary if every ammunation killed you like in the old days

/execute would be overpowered

[Banjo]

let's say this gets implemented, is there any way you could stop from /executing someone?

[Dylan12369]

This is actually a pretty good idea, but it would have to be person specific...

As in the only person who can /execute is the person who /tied them, which might prove to be difficult considering the current system allows Anyone to /tie /untie people, which also leads me to believe there is no tracking system on who does the /tie.

Although, adding a "You misses the victim and he/she escapes!!!" clause, causing the victim to escape the /tie, might make it a little more "Fair"

How the hell would you miss? If I was going to execute someone, I would shove the barrel of the gun into their mouths, ensuring I hit my target.

[Banjo]

You are stupid, tied people cannot be shot, if that's what you mean!

PS: Your post does not represent the quotation of David Lewis.