SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Anna_Rose · Post by **Anna_Rose** » December 6th, 2009, 8:11 pm

Although we are not cops since we can cuff we want to be able to use this command for our safety. When we deatain someone it keeps them from killing people, orus from having to shoot them. I dont like attacking every miscreant who chooses not to put his handsup, so, I dont want us to have tazers, but maybe something to daze the person for a couple seconds so we can cuff em.

PLEASE

848.0 · Post by **Slopko** » December 6th, 2009, 8:21 pm

So you don't want tazers but you want tazers, got it.

Anna_Rose · Post by **Anna_Rose** » December 6th, 2009, 8:26 pm

mmm, i want a way to cuff someone without there handsup. Maybe we can cuff once every 5 sec, and when we cuff there is a 1 in 5 chance we succeed cause we are bumbling SAS. I think thats fair.

Andre Stewart · Post by **Andre Stewart** » December 6th, 2009, 8:30 pm

Only thing that could be given would be like a /tackle that stuns them for 2 seconds.

Never trust SAS

vikki · Post by **vikki** » December 6th, 2009, 8:30 pm

no way jose

848.0 · Post by **Slopko** » December 6th, 2009, 8:37 pm

It's never going to happen, so just be happy you can cuff noobs that don't know that SAS are a joke.

Anna_Rose · Post by **Anna_Rose** » December 6th, 2009, 8:42 pm

Fine, I guess Il just Deagle people dealing small amounts of pot.

Anna_Rose · Post by **Anna_Rose** » December 6th, 2009, 8:42 pm

btw, i think the tackle thing is cool

Bankwell · Post by **Bankwell** » December 6th, 2009, 8:47 pm

I'm going to be leaderflagged SAS soon and even I don't think this should happen for the fact that I'd have to punish too many people and SAS would end up 1/4th the size as it could potentially be.

vikki · Post by **vikki** » December 6th, 2009, 9:07 pm

if you want to taze and detain people join the PD

Mac_Taylor · Post by **Mac_Taylor** » December 7th, 2009, 2:14 pm

Bankwell wrote:I'm going to be leaderflagged SAS soon and even I don't think this should happen for the fact that I'd have to punish too many people and SAS would end up 1/4th the size as it could potentially be.

im leader too, i agree with goku some of currently sas agents will be kicked, including yu anna_rose, you ad dwayne are dming too much people and i got reports of that.

about he leaderflag..i got it now

143.0 · Post by **elijah_triggs** » December 7th, 2009, 6:46 pm

Honestly being in sas most of you would abuse this.. 8/10 chance

Anna_Rose · Post by **Anna_Rose** » December 7th, 2009, 7:45 pm

welp, if its got a 1 out of 5 chance to cuff only every 5 sec, we cant really abuse. We can also have it alert PD if we have cuffed someone so they can come out and deal with the situation, see it was fair or not.

1446.0 · Post by **Chris Hansen** » December 7th, 2009, 8:07 pm

you are not a real cop

John_Pendergast · Post by **John_Pendergast** » December 8th, 2009, 5:29 am

SAS is a SECURITY thing. Not a wannabe-PD thing. If you want to go around tazing people go to the LSPD, they can help you.

Security guards =/= cops.

Want a way to control suspects? It's not your job. But if you really need to do so, go and grab your deagle.

Anna_Rose · Post by **Anna_Rose** » December 8th, 2009, 5:40 am

MMk, It seems then I am missing the point of my job cause no one has an answer:

If someone is shooting another civ. I kill them.

Seems about it huh?

BUT I WAS TOLD

That if someone was wanted, we could go detain them and then deliver them to police.

Oh fucking well. Il just go DM some n00b; farmer with an mp5.

At least I try to make em put their handsup etc. intead of just BLASTING them in the ass.

Anna_Rose · Post by **Anna_Rose** » December 8th, 2009, 5:41 am

Anna_Rose wrote:welp, if its got a 1 out of 5 chance to cuff only every 5 sec, we cant really abuse. We can also have it alert PD if we have cuffed someone so they can come out and deal with the situation, see it was fair or not.

Note: We dont arrest, we cuff em and have the cops take it from there, is that not fair? Isnt that basically what would happen IRL anyway?

BigAssGoat · Post by **BigAssGoat** » December 8th, 2009, 6:01 am

Just go fucking guard kids, who steal toys.

Admiral_Ackbar · Post by **Admiral_Ackbar** » December 8th, 2009, 9:52 pm

Anna_Rose wrote:Fine, I guess Il just Deagle people dealing small amounts of pot.

Who the fuck put this retard in SAS? You aren't a cop idiot fuck off.

Also I guess Il just Deagle you for false imprisonments and murder.

Mac_Taylor · Post by **Mac_Taylor** » December 10th, 2009, 11:19 am

Anna_Rose you should stop talking about SAS all that that includes SAS cuz you'll be out of SAS as fast as i can do it, so enjoy your last hours being a SAS officer.

Kicked for Dming People - I got reports of that

Dwayne_Dinami - Kicked for Dming People - Got reports of him too, also trying to join PD, what a nab..

PERMADENIED

haz0r · Post by **haz0r** » December 10th, 2009, 6:51 pm

Mac_Taylor wrote:Anna_Rose you should stop talking about SAS all that that includes SAS cuz you'll be out of SAS as fast as i can do it, so enjoy your last hours being a SAS officer.

Kicked for Dming People - I got reports of that

Dwayne_Dinami - Kicked for Dming People - Got reports of him too, also trying to join PD, what a nab..

PERMADENIED

mac taylor you are so worthless why are you even trying

Bankwell · Post by **Bankwell** » December 10th, 2009, 8:02 pm

still don't have my leaderflag.

John_Pendergast · Post by **John_Pendergast** » December 11th, 2009, 6:50 am

Me neither but there's an interesting comment in an interesting topic saying that SAS was reverted to original state.

Dan · Post by **Dan** » December 11th, 2009, 7:24 am

Mac_Taylor wrote:Anna_Rose you should stop talking about SAS all that that includes SAS cuz you'll be out of SAS as fast as i can do it, so enjoy your last hours being a SAS officer.

Kicked for Dming People - I got reports of that

Dwayne_Dinami - Kicked for Dming People - Got reports of him too, also trying to join PD, what a nab..

PERMADENIED

gtfo noob

Casey_Calvert · Post by **Casey_Calvert** » December 12th, 2009, 9:43 pm

John_Pendergast wrote:SAS is a SECURITY thing. Not a wannabe-PD thing. If you want to go around tazing people go to the LSPD, they can help you.

Security guards =/= cops.

Want a way to control suspects? It's not your job. But if you really need to do so, go and grab your deagle.

Well it being a SECURITY faction, security in real life do tackle people who are in the wrong such as shop lifters. They also can have tazers.

The the more Security transportation of people and pressious items they can be armed with a hand firearm and a shotgun. They could also have body armor.

I'm not sure if people know that i did suggest the /tackle command, it being a simple close range attack to be able to subdue a suspect.

As Elijah said 8/10 people would abuse this and yeah they most probably would.

Having a more than capable leader that can control them and actually having a hiring system. If the SAS had more commands and equipment available to subdue suspects and help other Law Enforcement Officials, it would be more effective in Law Enforcement.For people who pass the tests or exams they would be in fact less retarded. Therefore being able to not go crazy with shotguns and mp5's with full armor and shooting up the joint.

I, being non-retarded which is large scarcity in the field of San Andreas Security, if we were given certain privileges the system would harder and people not following protocols would be obviously demoted or shitcanned.

Seeing as the SAS Leader flag is given out like candy to people, of course SAS is being what it always has been.

And Anna you were terrrrrrible. What is wrong with you?

SZR GTA

SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect

Re: SAS some way to "Control" the suspect